Nexrad Weather Control: Tornado Termination 101

Published on May 22, 2013

Nano Skies Movie: Chemtrails Revealed (HD) http://ow.ly/fO55Z

Weather War Big Picture: Geo & Bio-Engineering - V.1http://ow.ly/fa0NI

Nexrad Weather Control: Vortex Creation 101 http://ow.ly/i13AV

Nexrad Weather Control: Creating Cloud Systems 101http://ow.ly/hv9AX


Email: weatherwar@gmx.com

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/WeatherWar101

YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/WeatherWar101

25 Ways To Suppress Truth The Rules of Disinformation (video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9WFRe...

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation
http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html

Exhaustive List of Geoengineering & Chemtrail PATENTS
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an...

Artificial Cloud generation locations (approx)

PG 1: 28°37'13.68"N 101°21'24.98"W
PG 2: 29°19'23.94"N 102°31'4.86"W
PG 3: 29°57'54.47"N 103°17'27.52"W
PG 4: 30°40'47.92"N 104°16'51.20"W
PG 5: 29°54'17.43"N 105°58'29.84"W
PG 6: 29°57'34.32"N 107°38'57.33"W
PG 7: 30°34'34.74"N 108°15'27.72"W
PG 8: 32°16'0.14"N 108°25'23.23"W
PG 9: 27°25'35.35"N 101°16'12.62"W


Resources:

United States Patent 5003186 for seeding stratosphere with metal aerosol in jet fuel [pdf]

http://www.carnicominstitute.org/

http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/

http://chemtrails.cc/

http://aircrap.org/chemtrail-barium-c...

http://www.morgellonsexposed.com/

http://www.aboutthesky.com/

http://nowcoast.noaa.gov/

http://www.weather.gov

http://wxanalyst.com/radar/

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/gis/kml/

http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/kmzgen...

http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/s...

http://www.letxa.com/nexradsite.php?S...

http://www.wunderground.com/

http://weather.org/radar.htm

http://www.intellicast.com/Local/WxMa...

http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwc...

http://www.theweathernetwork.com/weat...

http://weather.unisys.com/radar/rcm_r...

http://www.weatheronline.com/weather/......

http://www.colinandrews.net/HAARP.html


Video Sources:

The_Adirondacks
http://youtu.be/HrNPEfEYncQ

New_York_City_-_gorgeous_aerial_video_to­­ur
http://youtu.be/4yIZYtHqF7I

Amongst_The_Rubble_What_they_don_t_want_­­you_to_see_9_11
http://youtu.be/QA9r9sHXs8A

WTC_7_NEW_FOOTAGE_MAN_INSIDE_YELLING
http://youtu.be/4TXaQcPK-t4

September_11_2001_Video
http://youtu.be/wNNTcHq5Tzk

Chemtrails_Produced_by_Aviation_Fuel_Lac­­ed_with_Aluminum_or_Trimethylaluminum
http://youtu.be/Ie441sDrFl8

a_cloud_passes_over_Ohare_scary
http://youtu.be/wPoz08M_ibk

Storm_Clouds_Moving_South_16X_Real-Time_­­on_August_13_2011
http://youtu.be/EVTUlDQCAtA

weird_storm_cloud
http://youtu.be/vCjjLykw33E

Crazy_Storm_shelf_cloud_wall_before_stor­­m_hits
http://youtu.be/TCnsI_BeX5g

Lenticular_and_Wave_Cloud_Timelapse_-_Bo­­ulder_CO_-_01.23.12
http://youtu.be/exTRLIlD-Xg

11_18_11_Stationary_Cloud
http://youtu.be/Zbw30i3emlM

Reno_Lenticular_time-lapse
http://youtu.be/eV2zkZQe9DM

Miley Cyrus ‘Can’t Stop’ With the Sexy Photos

Miley Cyrus's fans were no doubt excited when the singer released her eagerly anticipated new single "We Can't Stop" on Monday. But even those who aren't interested in her music were also probably excited – at the racy photos Cyrus tweeted to promote the tune.

Cyrus tweeted and Facebooked out a variety of increasingly sexy images up to her single's drop, all of which showed off plenty of her trim figure. In one, she sports a plunging one-piece bathing suit; another series features skintight white workout clothes and plenty of attitude (...and cleavage!).
Miley Cyrus/Facebook
Miley Cyrus/Facebook
Miley Cyrus/Facebook
That's just a sampling of the images Cyrus has been offering up to her fanbase. Check out her social media for more; including shots of her dancing with giant teddy bears and showing off a pair of super-short shorts from behind.
Cyrus has also been attracting gossip these days for her rumored breakup with fiance Liam Hemsworth; as well as her unlikely collaboration with rapper Snoop Lion, "Ashtrays and Heartbreaks." Cyrus's name did not appear in the credits for the song's video, causing many fans to raise an eyebrow or two at the omission.

Cybersecurity 2020 Student Essay Center

Are you a student with great ideas on the future of cyber security policy? Have you conducted research on how to measure the security impact of policies around the world? If so, read on for how you can win $5,000 cash for your research in this essay contest.

Overview

Cybersecurity is a policy priority for many governments but there is limited understanding of whether and how policy choices impact cyber risk outcomes. While many countries have made significant investments in the development and implementation of cybersecurity policy regimes, cybercriminals continue to make headway. With that in mind, policymakers are left to question the impact of their policy investments. Given this unknown, many policymakers have struggled to choose policies that will have the greatest positive outcome in managing cyber risk.
At the same time, the cyber ecosystem is undergoing tremendous change. The growth in Internet users across Asia, Africa, and Latin America; the proliferation of connected devices; and the explosive rise in Internet traffic are just a few of the mega-trends reshaping the Internet. Accordingly, regardless of today’s policy challenges and solutions, tomorrow’s landscape is likely to present new risks and opportunities.

What is the contest?

Microsoft is looking for original research about these cybersecurity policy challenges from university students at any stage in their educational development. Specifically, research should address one or both of the following questions; in both instances, preference will be given to responses that integrate quantitative analysis using publically-available cybersecurity data and research, such as the Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (SIR):

1. Which cybersecurity policy choices have the most impact on cybersecurity outcomes and, based upon your answer, are there “actionable” recommendations for policymakers?
   • For example, have national-level regimes for securing government networks had a meaningful impact on cybersecurity? How might those regimes be improved?
   • Additionally, for example, can cybersecurity policies impact user-level security? And if so, how?
2. Given the growth in people, devices, and data connected to the Internet, how should policymakers adapt current approaches, and are there elements missing from the current policy landscape that should be created, or existing instruments that should be deprecated?
   • For example, many global-level cybersecurity policy regimes were created when most Internet users were based on North America and Europe; will the rise in Internet users in Asia, Africa, and Latin America require changes to these regimes?
   • Additionally, for example, cybersecurity policies have been optimized for a desktop-centric world, where the computing machine, their operating systems, and often their users were fixed within a geography. What changes are necessary to accommodate a more mobile-based world?

What prizes are offered?

Microsoft will award cash prizes for the top three essays according to the judging criteria:

• 1st place - $5,000
• 2nd place - $3,000
• 3rd place - $2,000

Where can I get more details?

For more information, please see the Official Rules.
Also, visit the Microsoft Global Security Strategy and Diplomacy website to learn how this team works collaboratively with governments, multilateral organizations, industry, and non-profit groups to enhance security across the cyberecosystem.

How do I enter?

To enter, send an email to cyber-essay@microsoft.com with your essay in Microsoft Word format and include the following information: first name, last name, email address, and school / university. Entries must be received by 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time (PT) on June 14, 2013.

See this iconic glass beach before it’s too late

Thanks to people who ignore the rules, Mendocino County's Glass Beach is rapidly fading away

May 30, 2013 by Travis Burke

Glass Beach is best viewed at low tide, and it is pocketed with tide pools where sea anemones rest among motley-colored pebbles. Photo by Travis Burke

There is a beach in Fort Bragg, California, that’s famous for the iridescent sea glass that shimmers on its shores. A dump until the 1960s, Glass Beach underwent massive cleanup projects in the late 1990s and early 2000s, but the glass from bottles and other items remained, worn smooth over time as it tumbled through the ocean.

Glass Beach is one of Mendocino County’s most popular tourist spots, as it’s one of the most abundant sources of sea glass in the world. But if you want to see this California treasure, go now, because it will likely be gone before we know it.

“Everybody is taking the glass and collecting it, so there’s not as much as there used to be,” said a clerk at Fort Bragg’s tourist information office.

In fact, even though removing sea glass from the beach is prohibited, rangers from California State Parks, which owns the beach, see people taking the smooth, pebble-like glass pieces home in Ziploc bags and buckets all the time. They try to stop people who fill up canisters as large as trashcans with sea glass, but there’s only so much they can prevent, they say.

The locals will tell you that the beach used to be covered in a foot of sea glass so smooth you could walk on it with bare feet, but these days there are sections of the 38-acre beach where glass is difficult to come by. Many say their only hope is to spread the word about the beach and what’s threatening it, crossing their fingers that people will begin minding the signs that say “glass collecting prohibited.”

For many, the destruction of Glass Beach is ironic, as it was the human penchant for destruction that created the beach in the first place. Without human waste, the beach would never have existed.

For now, Glass Beach remains—and here’s to hoping we humans can keep it that way.

Glass Beach from above; photo by Travis Burke

Many of the most colorful and beautiful pieces of glass have been stolen from the beach. Photo by Travis Burke

People tend to ignore the signs that say glass collecting is prohibited. Photo by Travis Burke

Stop by the beach any day and you will see people placing glass in plastic bags and canisters. This woman inspects a glass piece for her collection. Photo by Travis Burke

Three people look for sea glass; photo by Travis Burke

While Glass Beach is the most popular spot for sea glass in Mendocino County, the area is actually home to two other sea glass beaches. They are both difficult to access, and one of them is surrounded by private land, which is why they are rarely visited. Photo by Travis Burke

The beach—and Mendocino County—is also a nice place to visit for its natural beauty. Photo by Travis Burke

A younger piece of sea glass that hasn’t yet been smoothed out by water and time. Photo by Travis Burke

Glass Beach from above and below; photo by Travis Burke

Find Travis Burke on Facebook and Instagram.

For more from Travis Burke, click here.

DID ADAM HAVE THREE PARENTS?

News of advances in artificial human reproduction –- the treatment of infertility,  In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF), genetic enhancement, cloning -– have become commonplace.   Yet a headline over a recent news report caught my attention and aroused my curiosity:

IVF Creates Fetuses With Three Parents

  The report, as rendered in the New Scientist issue of 18 October 2003, concerned “a woman that has become pregnant through a procedure that combines a controversial IVF method with one of the techniques used for cloning.”
  The feat was performed by American scientific teams at a Chinese Medical Science University and concerned a woman who failed to conceive, even through IVF techniques, because her embryos stopped developing after two days.  The new procedure, using IVF (In-Vitro Fertilization) methods, first removed the woman’s egg, fertilized it with her husband’s sperm outside the womb, and then –- and that was the innovation –- obtained the eggs of another woman (“the donor”), emptied them of their genetic nuclei, re-injected into these donated eggs the fertilized material from the woman’s egg, and then re-implanted the manipulated eggs in wombs (the woman’s or that of a donor).   
  The key change in the previously-recorded procedures was that by using the donor’s egg even without its normal DNA, the DNA that comes only from the woman -- mitochondrial DNA or mtDNA –- has been preserved in the recombined egg.   By having the mtDNA not of the woman but that of the donor, conception and pregnancy took hold.  
  Thus, not only procedurally but also genetically, the fetus had three parents:  The woman, the male partner, and the female donor.
Now, Read the Sumerian Texts…
  This report caught my attention because it sounds very much like the problems, and the solutions, encountered by Enki and Ninmah (later known as Ninti) when they engaged in genetic engineering to fashion “The Adam” -– the Earthling -– by upgrading the wild Homo erectus found in southeast Africa to become Homo sapiens (you and me).
  The Sumerian creation texts -– yes, texts, not one but several –- have been reported by me in my first book, The 12th Planet, enlarged upon in Genesis Revisited, and then rendered in maximal detail in The Lost Book of Enki (2002). The methods used, the trial and error, the involvement of the young son of Enki Ningishzidda, are all there.   But after the successful fashioning of the male Adamu, the efforts to fashion a female counterpart failed.   It was then that Enki realized that the problem might be the re-implanting of the fertilized egg in the womb of an Earthling female.

“For a counterpart to Adamu to be fashioned, in the womb of an Anunnaki female conception is needed!” so did Enki say.

  Success came after Enki’s spouse, Ninki, volunteered to have the recombined egg implanted in her womb.   The change, the recent experiments reveal, was that the source of the mtDNA was that of Ninki, an Anunnaki female, and not the Earthling mother.  

Ti-Amat –- the biblical Eve -– thus had the DNA of three parents.

  Once again, modern science corroborates the Sumerian knowledge.

And Speaking of Clay...

While writing the above article, another news item captured the media's (and my) attention.  Headlined MAYBE WE CAME FROM CLAY AFTER ALL, it reported (to quote the MSNBC News version) from Washington DC on October 23, 2003 that

Science backed up religion Thursday in a study that suggests life may have indeed sprung from clay -- just as many faiths teach.
A team at Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston said they had shown that materials in clay supported processes similar to those that may have given rise to life.
Specifically, a clay mixture called montmorillonite not only helps form little bags of fat and liquid, but helps cells use genetic material called RNA; that, in turn, is one of the key processes of life.

The report then quotes the scientists involved for additional details of the procedures based on the use of clay, and refers the readers to the relevant verses in Genesis.

In The 12th Planet I quoted the relevant Sumerian texts (that preceded the biblical tale by several millennia) that refer to the use of clay.  In the The Lost Book of Enki the repeated failures to obtain a non-defective newborn are described, with success coming only after Enki realized that

Perchance the shortfall is not in the admixture...
Perchance neither in the female's oval
nor in the essences is the hindrance --
Of what the Earth itself is fashioned,
perchance that is what is missing?

And success in obtaining the perfect model of Adamu came after Ninmah followed his instructions and instead of combining the genes in a crystal vessel, it was done in a vessel made of the CLAY OF THE EARTH.  (The Lost Book of Enki, page 136).

In this detail too, modern science is following the "Technologies of the gods."

October 2003

ZECHARIA SITCHIN

Mermaids: Nonsense or Nuisance?

• 
  Yahoo! TV/Animal Planet - Mermaids swimming through the deep ocean.

RELATED CONTENT

• View Gallery
  'Mermaids: The Body Found'

Animal Planet has raised quite a furor over its airing of the "speculative" documentary "Mermaids: The New Evidence." Capping its annual Monster Week, a network once known for safari shows and puppy bowls is turning over increasing amounts of its broadcast time to cryptozoology shows like "Lost Tapes," "Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real," and "Finding Bigfoot".

In fact, "Finding Bigfoot" was at the center of another, similar,controversy reported last year by Entertainment Weekly as TV critics turned skeptics, forced Animal Planet president Marjorie Kaplan to offer a vague defense of the show as "an exploration of the secret corners of the planet," since it lacks anything approaching hard evidence.

Should They Have Aired It?

Animal Planet has 3.6 million reasons (as in viewers!) why they should've.

There's really nothing wrong with using actors to re-enact scenes for a documentary. But where is the line? "Unsolved Mysteries" gives a framework for its actors to pretend they were criminals, but actors on "Mermaids" pretend they're scientists with nothing but a tiny caveat in the credits to suggest it's anything but 100% fact.

Animal Planet's first "Mermaids" installment, "Mermaids: The Body Found," garnered 3.4 million views during its U.S. telecast premiere on Sunday, May 27, 2012. After the airing, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had to release an official statement putting it, in unequivocal terms, "No evidence of aquatic humanoids has ever been found." Marine biologist David Shiffman wrote an article for Slate explaining why we should stop worrying about mythical sea life and focus on the damage being done to the sea life we know exists. He talks about fisheries where up to 90 percent of a catch is made up of unintended victims. Not the commercial fish, but "endangered sea turtles and sea birds as well as marine mammals."

So, do mermaids exist?

Science says no. But science is a process of discovery. And, as this tweet's skepticism of skepticism suggests:

There's no reason not to believe that they might.

But science is also pretty good at predicting. And just because we haven't laid eyes on 90% of the ocean, doesn't mean we don't have a pretty good idea of what's going on down there. Just because you haven't been to your tool shed in a month doesn't make it any more likely that Bigfoot's decided to take up residence in there.

[Related: Eight Reasons Why Werewolves, Vamps, and Zombies Are Taking the Backseat to Mermaids]

Despite this, the fascination with mermaids persists, as the comments on articles like these attest. And why not? It fills the unknown depths of the ocean with hope and wonder rather than fear. Kaplan isn't exaggerating when she says, "These extraordinary television specials have electrified, challenged, and entertained television audiences."

Maybe all these numbers mean is we need a little more mystery. It's been a while since the "X-Files" sent us off to search the skies. How about, instead of a faux doc, we make a show featuring two charismatic FBI agents uncovering the "truth" about mermaids on a weekly basis? Of course, the two attractive agents would be constantly getting soaked and spending most of the episodes half-naked waiting for their clothes to dry. That ought to be enough to blow the ratings numbers for "Mermaids" — ahem — out of the water.

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/mermaids--nonsense-or-nuisance--192009947.html

Underwater city or weird square shape in deep sea

Another underwater city or just my imagination

here the coordinate