Sunday, December 25, 2016
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Monday, December 19, 2016
The Electoral College has officially cast enough votes to make Donald Trump president
The Electoral College has officially cast enough votes to make Donald Trump president
:format(webp)/cdn3.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/52367471/GettyImages_615455652.0.jpeg)
Donald Trump has topped the 270 constituent votes he needs to end up president, dashing a few liberals' fantasies of a last-minute Electoral College revolt that would piece him from the workplace.
For sure, the mind larger part of voters from states Trump won a month ago did in truth cast their discretionary votes in favor of him, as they were relied upon to, as per reports from the different state capitals that have been streaming in for the duration of the day.
Trump will wind up with 304 constituent votes, well over the 270 he needs. Just two Trump voters abandoned from him, with one voting in favor of John Kasich and the other for Ron Paul.
Hillary Clinton wound up losing more voters. Despite the fact that not all the constituent votes from Clinton states have been checked yet, four of Washington state's 12 Democratic voters declined to vote in favor of her. Rather, three voted in favor of previous Secretary of State Colin Powell and one for Faith Spotted Eagle, an extremist required in challenging the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Three different voters endeavored to desert from Clinton in different states, however two were supplanted by substitutes, with the other altering his opinion on a revote:
In Minnesota, Sanders-supporting Democratic voter Muhammad Abdurrahmanreportedly declined to make a choice, so as indicated by state law, he was supplanted with a substitute who voted for Clinton.
In Maine, Democratic voter David Bright voted in favor of Bernie Sanders at to start with, yet his vote was precluded of request, and he changed it to Clinton amid a revote.
In Colorado, Democratic voter Michael Baca endeavored to make his choice for John Kasich (as a major aspect of the fizzled plan to persuade Trump voters to back a direct Republican), yet he was rejected and supplanted by a substitute, who voted in favor of Clinton.
Hypothetically, legitimate difficulties could be propelled identified with some of these appointive votes, since the defendability of state laws restricting balloters has never genuinely been tried in the courts. However, in any event for the present, they're set to mean Clinton.
In general, however, these will all be insignificant to the result, since Trump will wind up with a considerable amount more than the greater part of discretionary votes he needs to formally win the administration.
The framework functioned not surprisingly, however genuine shortcomings remain
In any typical late year, this would scarcely should be elucidated. For about two centuries, the Electoral College has been a chronologically misguided convention that exists fundamentally to endorse the aftereffects of votes cast by the subjects of different states.
Yet, it has for quite some time been in any event hypothetically workable for voters to denounce any and all authority. Before Monday, nine balloters in the previous century had in actuality done as such, resisting the aftereffects of their states. Generally, they did as such as some kind of dissent (however in one case, it apparently happened coincidentally).
Also, it seems that in a genuinely close Electoral College vote, our presidential race framework may truly be defenseless against some wickedness from balloters. This result drives that home, with various irresolute balloters that is a record for the advanced period.
Still, as I've been composing for quite a long time, a result changing balloter revolt was inconceivably far-fetched to happen this year, for a few reasons. Trump's edge of triumph in constituent votes was essentially too enormous. Many states have laws "authoritative" voters to the consequences of the statewide vote. What's more, the Trump-supporting voters are for the most part picked by the state Republican gatherings or are moderate activists, and are in this way far-fetched to oppose the will of the GOP.
Presently, in fact, the votes cast in state capitals the whole way across the nation still need to authoritatively be tallied by the new Congress on January 6, 2017. In any case, since the vote sums are altogether made open today, that will be a convention — Donald Trump has won.
http://www.vox.com/2016/12/19/14007112/electoral-college-vote-updates
El Colegio Electoral ha emitido oficialmente bastantes votos para hacer presidente de Donald Trump
Actualizado por Andrew Prokop 19 de diciembre de 2016, 5:38 pm EST
PÍO
COMPARTIR
MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty
Donald Trump ha encabezado los 270 votos constitutivos que necesita para terminar siendo presidente, arrojando algunas fantasías de los liberales de una revuelta de último momento en el Colegio Electoral que lo separaría del lugar de trabajo.
Por supuesto, la mayor parte de la mente de los votantes de los estados Trump ganó hace un mes hizo en verdad sus votos discrecionales a favor de él, como se les confiaba, según los informes de las diferentes capitales de los estados que han estado fluyendo en el Duración del día.
Trump terminará con 304 votos constitutivos, más de los 270 que necesita. Sólo dos votantes Trump abandonados de él, con una votación a favor de John Kasich y la otra para Ron Paul.
Hillary Clinton terminó perdiendo más votantes. A pesar del hecho de que no todos los votos constituyentes de los estados de Clinton han sido revisados todavía, cuatro de los 12 votantes demócratas del estado de Washington declinaron votar a favor de ella. Más bien, tres votaron a favor del anterior Secretario de Estado Colin Powell y uno para Faith Spotted Eagle, un extremista requerido para desafiar el Dakota Access Pipeline.
Tres votantes diferentes trataron de desertar de Clinton en diferentes estados, sin embargo dos fueron suplantados por sustitutos, con la otra alterando su opinión sobre un revote:
En Minnesota, el votante demócrata Muhammad Abdurrahman, apoyado por Sanders, se negó a hacer una elección, por lo que, según lo indicado por la ley estatal, fue sustituido por un sustituto que votó por Clinton.
En Maine, el votante demócrata David Bright votó a favor de Bernie Sanders para comenzar con, pero su voto fue excluido de la solicitud, y lo cambió a Clinton en medio de una revote.
En Colorado, el votante demócrata Michael Baca se esforzó por hacer su elección para John Kasich (como un aspecto importante del plan fallido para persuadir a los votantes de Trump de apoyar a un republicano directo), pero fue rechazado y suplantado por un suplente que votó a favor de Clinton.
Hipotéticamente, las dificultades legítimas podrían ser identificadas con algunos de estos votos de nominación, ya que la defensa de las leyes estatales que limitan a los balloters nunca ha sido verdaderamente juzgada por los tribunales. Sin embargo, en cualquier caso por el momento, están destinados a significar Clinton.
En general, sin embargo, todos serán insignificantes para el resultado, ya que Trump terminará con una cantidad considerable más que la mayor parte de los votos discrecionales que necesita para ganar formalmente la administración.
El marco funcionó no sorprendentemente, sin embargo subsisten deficiencias genuinas
En cualquier año tardío típico, esto difícilmente debería ser aclarado. Durante casi dos siglos, el Colegio Electoral ha sido una convención cronológicamente equivocada que existe fundamentalmente para respaldar las secuelas de los votos emitidos por los súbditos de los diferentes estados.
Sin embargo, desde hace bastante tiempo, en cualquier caso, hipotéticamente es factible que los votantes denuncien toda autoridad. Antes del lunes, nueve balloters en el siglo anterior habían hecho en realidad como tales, resistiendo los efectos secundarios de sus estados. Por lo general, lo hicieron como una especie de disidencia (sin embargo en un caso, al parecer, sucedió por casualidad).
También, parece que en una votación del colegio electoral genuinamente cercana, nuestro marco presidencial de la raza puede estar realmente indefenso contra una cierta maldad de los balloters. Este resultado conduce a ese hogar, con varios balloters irresolutos que es un registro para el período avanzado.
Sin embargo, como he estado componiendo durante bastante tiempo, un resultado que cambiaba la rebelión de los balloter era inconcebiblemente exagerado para suceder este año, por algunas razones. El triunfo de Triumph en los votos constitutivos era esencialmente demasiado enorme. Muchos estados tienen leyes que "autorizan" a los votantes a las consecuencias del voto estatal. Lo que es más, los votantes que apoyan a Trump son en su mayor parte elegidos por las reuniones republicanas del estado o son activistas moderados, y son de esta manera inverosímiles para oponerse a la voluntad del Partido Republicano.
En la actualidad, de hecho, los votos emitidos en las capitales de los estados de todo el camino a través de la nación aún deben ser autoritariamente contados por el nuevo Congreso el 6 de enero de 2017. En cualquier caso, ya que las sumas del voto están completamente abiertas hoy, que será Una convención - Donald Trump ha ganado.
Http://www.vox.com/2016/12/19/14007112/electoral-college-vote-updates
Thursday, December 15, 2016
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Saturday, December 10, 2016
Friday, December 9, 2016
BREAKING: Obama Accepts 2500 Middle East CRIMINAL Refugees REJECTED by Australia
BREAKING: Obama Accepts 2500 Middle East CRIMINAL Refugees REJECTED by Australia
Is this Obama’s final slap in the face to the American people?
Obama has been orchestrating a secret deal to bring in the so-called “refugees” before Trump takes office.
However, that’s not even the worst part……
Obama has classified the details on the refugees.
From Daily Caller:
Senate and House Judiciary chairmen called on the White House Tuesday to declassify the details of a secret agreement to accept some 2,000 refugees currently held in off-shore detention camps by Australia. The vast majority of the refugees housed in these camps are from the Middle East and have so far been rejected for resettlement by Australia. The reasons behind their rejection have not been made public. The White House has agreed to resettle many of them in the U.S., but in an unprecedented move, has classified the details of the plan.
Republicans Sen. Chuck Grassley and Rep. Bob Goodlatte raised concerns about the classification of the details following news of the agreement in November, and said Congress should have been consulted about the agreement. They attended a close-door brief with White House officials on details of the deal, which they said has convinced them there is “absolutely … no reason” for the specifics of the plan to be kept a secret from the American public.
“It is now absolutely apparent to us that there was no reason for the agreement to be classified from the outset, and that it should not continue to be classified,” Grassley and Goodlatte wrote in a letter to the Department of Homeland Security. “To that end, we request that you declassify the document outlining the agreement so that the American people can read it.”
Source: BREAKING : Obama Classifies Details of Agreement to Accept 2500 Middle East Detention-Center Refugees REJECTED by Australia – TruthFeed
Always remember to SHARE important information! We can change the world.
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
How to reconnect my ZMODE GREET to my new wifi network
Not bad new after all,I was there ,i change my wifi network and lost Greet communication with my wifi,not big deal,just calm down and follow my instruction
- Get the book that brought the box where it was delivery your Greet device
- open app
- click add
- click Zink
- follow the instruction
ooo
Please check that your devices meet the minimum requirements for setup:
-You have a strong WiFi signal at the location of installation. If you are unsure, please view the following FAQ on testing your wireless signal strength. If your signal strength is weak, please refer to the following FAQ for tips to improve your wireless signal strength.
-Your router is broadcasting a 2.4GHz WPA/WPA2 password-protected WiFi network.
-If you have a dual-band router, make sure that the 2.4GHz signal is broadcasting with a different SSID than your 5GHz signal. For example, you can set your 2.4GHz signal to be "Home WiFi" and your 5GHz signal to be "Home WiFi_5GHz".
-You are using an iOS® (v.7.0 and up) or AndroidTM smart mobile device for setup.
If your wireless network does not meet minimum requirements, please follow the instructions below:
1. Access your wireless router settings. If you are unfamiliar with how to access your router settings, please refer to the corresponding FAQ, linked here.
2. Find the tab or setting called Wireless or Wireless Settings.
3. Find the field with a title similar to Wireless Network Name (SSID).
4. Rename the SSID for your 5GHz signal so that it is different from the SSID of your 2.4GHz signal.
5. Find the option called Security and select WPA or WPA2 personal. Set a strong password for your wireless network.
6. Make sure that the Wireless SSID Broadcast or SSID Broadcast setting for your 2.4GHz network is enabled.
If you have met the minimum requirements and are still having issues, please follow the steps below to troubleshoot for "Zink" or "Automatic Connection" methods.
-If the Status Light is blinking green, try removing special characters and spaces from the SSID (WiFi network name) like "$" or "!".
-If the Status Light is solid blue, then the device has already connected to the WiFi network. You can add the device by returning to the Add Device menu, selecting the "Wireless Device and Smart Kit" connection method and choosing the "Wireless Device" option. The app should automatically search for all devices on the WiFi network; please make sure that your smartphone is connected to the same WiFi network.
If you have met the minimum requirements and are still having issues, please follow the steps below to troubleshoot your router for the SmartLink setup.
1. Access your wireless router settings. If you are unfamiliar with how to access your router settings, please refer to the corresponding FAQ, linked here.
2. Find the tab or setting called Wireless or Wireless Settings.
3. Find the option called Wireless Network Mode.
4. Set the wireless network mode of your 2.4GHz wireless network to 802.11b only, 802.11g only, or 802.11b/g only.
5. Retry the SmartLink setup from your smartphone while connecting to this network.
6. After SmartLink successfully connects your wireless device to the WiFi network, you can change your settings back to their original value. The wireless device will automatically connect to your network.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)