Sunday, October 25, 2015

Who was Ingo Swann; An extraordinary intelligent man


His latest book





Ingo Douglas Swann, (14 September 1933, Telluride, Colorado[2] – 31 January 2013, New York City[3]) was a psychic, artist, and author known for being the co-creator, along with Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff,[4] ofremote viewing, and specifically the Stargate Project.

Biography[edit]

Swann was a psychic who called himself a "consciousness researcher" who had sometimes experienced "altered states of consciousness." He said, "I don't get 'tested', I only work with researchers on well-designed experiments."[5] According to Russell Targ andHarold Puthoff, "Swann-inspired innovations" have led to impressive results in parapsychology. Indeed, experiments not controlled by Swann have not been successful, and they are rarely mentioned, and if so, only in passing.[6][7]

Remote viewing[edit]

Swann helped develop the process of remote viewing at the Stanford Research Institute in experiments that caught the attention of the Central Intelligence Agency. He is commonly credited with proposing the idea of controlled remote viewing, a process in which viewers would view a location given nothing but its geographical coordinates, which was developed and tested by Puthoff and Targ with CIA funding.[4]

Uri Geller[edit]

Due to the popularity of Uri Geller in the seventies, a critical examination of Swann's paranormal claims was basically overlooked by skeptics and historians.[8] Uri Geller commented very favorably on Swann, saying, "If you were blind and a man appeared who could teach you to see with mind power, you would revere him as a guru. So why is Ingo Swann ignored by publishers and forced to publish his astounding life story on the Internet?"[9]
Both Geller and Swann were tested by two experimenters, Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff, who concluded that they did indeed have unique skills.[4] Others have strongly disputed the scientific validity of Targ and Puthoff's experiments.[10] In a 1983 interview, magician Milbourne Christopher remarked that Swann was "one of the cleverest in the field."[11]

Out-of-body experiment[edit]

In 1972 in the newsletter of the American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR), their director of research Karlis Osis described his personal controlled out-of-body experiment with Swann. The targets that Swann was to attempt to describe and illustrate were on a shelf two feet from the ceiling and several feet above Swann's head. Osis does not describe the height of the ceiling.[12] Swann suggests, the ceiling was 14 feet in height.[5] The room was illuminated by two kitchen-style overhead fixtures. Swann sat alone in the chamber with wires from electrodes fastened to his head running through the wall behind him. Swann sat just beneath the target tray.[5] He was given a clipboard to use for sketching. Any movement while drawing did not result in "artifacts" in the brain readout.[13] In Swann's book To Kiss Earth Goodbye there is a photograph of the objects on the shelf. Swann wrote that he was aware of most of the objects on shelf above his head, but he did not know it held four numbers on a side. A side that would not have been visible if a reflecting surface had been angled near the end.[14][15]
Psychological scales were developed for rating the quality and clarity (as subjectively described) by Swann of his OOB vision, which varied from time to time. The results were evaluated by blind judging. A psychologist, either Bonnie Preskari or Carole K. Silfen, was asked to match up Swann's responses without knowing which target they were meant for. She matched all the eight sessions. Osis stressed the odds about Swann being correct were forty thousand to one. There is no record of any experiments being performed in the dark.[16]
Together, Silfen and Swann prepared an unofficial report of later out-of-body experiments and circulated it to 500 members of the ASPR, before the ASPR board was aware of it. According to Swann, Silfen has disappeared and cannot be located. He was searching for her and was asking for the public's help.[17] According to Swann, in April 1972 a move was made at the ASPR in New York to discredit him and throw him out because he was a Scientologist.[18][19]

Magnetometer psychokinesis tests[edit]

When Swann arrived at SRI, Harold Puthoff decided he would first be tested for psychokinesis, PK. On June 6, 1972, the two men paid a visit to Dr. Arthur Heberd and his quark detector, a magnetometer, at the Varian Physics Building. The well-shielded magnetometer had a small magnetic probe in a vault five feet beneath the floor. The oscillation had been running silently for about an hour tracing out a stable pattern on the chart recorder. Putoff asked Swann if he could affect the magnetometer’s magnetic field. Swann said he focused his attention on the interior of the magnetometer and was getting nothing.[7][20]
Then there are different versions of the following events. Puthoff states that after about a five-second delay,[7] Heberd says it was a ten- to fifteen-minute delay, the frequency of the trace recorder oscillation doubled for about 30 seconds (reportedly a common occurrence due to variations in the shared helium line to the lab). Heberd continues, when the curve burped, Swann asked, "Is that what I am supposed to do?"[21] Swann said he responded,"is that an effect?"[20] Then according to Heberd, Swann crossed the room taking his attention away from the chart recorder.[21] Swann said he took his mind off the machine and was sketching.[20] Others watched the recorder to see if the irregularity would be repeated, and it was. Puthoff asked Swann, "Did you do that too?"[21] Swann said he again responded, "Is that an effect?"[20] According to Puthoff, Swann said he was then tired and couldn’t “hold it any longer” and let go. The chart recorder pattern returned to normal.[7]
More supportive sources say that Heberd supports Puthoff's version that in the second instance Heberd suggested he would be more impressed if Swann could stop the field change altogether. Heberd denies he told James Randi that he never suggested it.[7] [21][22]Swann recalled he heard, “Can you do that again?” from Puthoff. Swann said his feats frightened some doctoral candidates, claiming that two "virtually ran" from the room and one collided with a "totally visible" structure support.[20]
Puthoff writes Dr. Heberd suggested all along there must be something wrong with the equipment. The following day it was certain the magnetometer was malfunctioning. "The equipment was behaving erratically; it was not possible to obtain a stable background signal for calibration." Therefore, the experiment was not repeated. Swann related this SNAFU in his book, Remote Viewing: The Real Story.[18] In his CIA report, paranormal expert, Dr. Kenneth A. Kress, does not record anything about Heberd's malfunctioning suggestions. Kress only writes, "These variations were never seen before or after this visit."[23] Though Swann was to spend a year at SRI, in their book, Targ and Puthoff present no further data and, Swann did not mention he was involved in any other PK experiments with the magnetometer than those that occurred and were recorded on June 6, 1972.[7]
Immediately after, Puthoff wrote a brief paper in a draft form. Rather than publishing the results in a scientific journal inviting peer review, this paper was circulated hand to hand throughout research and academic institutions across the U.S.A., and Puthoff accepted invitations to speak.[24] This paper caught the attention of the CIA and two agents paid a visit to Hal Puthoff at SRI and also met Swann. Later this paper was published as a part of a conference proceedings.[25][26]

Early Coordinate Remote Viewing experiments[edit]

Targ and Puthoff write about their pilot experiments, "We couldn't overlook the possibility that perhaps Ingo knew the geographical features of the earth and their approximate latitude and longitude. (It is Swann who suggests these Coordinate Remote Viewing tests, not the experimenters. He is in control.) "Or it was possible that we were inadvertently cueing the subject (Swann), since we as experimenters knew what the answers were." [27]
Soon Targ and Puthoff performed more experiments with Swann and the controls were tightened to eliminate the possibility of error. This time Swann was given the latitude and longitude of ten targets, in the end there would be ten runs, for a total of 100. Only the evaluations of the ten targets from the tenth run, the last, were disclosed. The results of the targets from the previous ninety (runs 1-9) are ignored. For the tenth run Swann had seven hits, two neutral and one miss. The experiments came to a close. Targ and Puthoff were positive "Something was happening, but they are not clear what it is."[28] (This method of selecting a small number of "guesses" from a larger, sometimes never disclosed larger number, is known as the free response method in remote viewing but could be called cherry picking.)[29][30] [31] According to Swann and Stanford Research International, his RV was correct probably 95% of the time. His personally trained students' RV were 85% correct, 85% of the time.[32][33] See:Stargate Project

Swann's Jupiter rings[edit]

Swann proposed a study to Targ and Puthoff. At first they resisted, for the resulting descriptions would be impossible to verify. Yet, on the evening 27 April 1973 Targ and Puthoff recorded Swann's remote viewing session of the planet Jupiter and Jupiter's moons,[34]prior to the Voyager probe's visit there in 1979.
Swann asked for 30 minutes of silence. According to Swann, his ability to see Jupiter took about three and a half minutes. In the session he made several reports on the physical features of Jupiter, such as its surface, atmosphere and weather. Swann's statement that Jupiter had planetary rings, like Saturn, was controversial at the time. The Voyager probe later confirmed the existence of the rings.[35]
The following are Swann's exact statements:
6:06:20 "Very high in the atmosphere there are crystals... they glitter. Maybe the stripes are like bands of crystals, maybe like rings of Saturn, though not far out like that. Very close within the atmosphere."(Unintelligible sentence.) "I bet you they'll reflect radio probes. Is that possible if you had a cloud of crystals that were assaulted by different radio waves?" [36]

Brain activity during remote viewing[edit]

In November 2001, there was an article by Michael Persinger published in The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences. The results with Swann suggested that during his remote viewing there were associated measurable changes in brain activity. There was bipolar electroencephalographic activity over the occipital, temporal and frontal lobes. Persinger concluded that there was "significant congruence" between the stimuli and Swann's electroencephalographic activity.[37]

Psychic detectives[edit]

Swann reported that out of the twenty-five criminal cases he worked between 1972 and 1979, twenty-two were flops and three were successes.[38][39] According to Swann, Gerard Croiset [40] and Peter Hurkos [41] were super sensitive sleuths. [42] Authors Arthur Lyons and Marcello Truzzi Ph.D., also a founder of the International Remote Viewing Association,[43] wrote the Croiset and Hurkos cases were "pure bunk" in their 1991 book The Blue Sense: Psychic Detectives and Crime.

Ufology[edit]

Swann was a supporter of ufology and Saucer Smear. Swann, writing "in appreciation of 'Saucer Smear' and its Esteemed Editor", wrote that "although many of its readers might view 'Saucer Smear' merely as a droll ufology gossip rag, in the larger picture it is rather more accurately a profound 'window' opening up onto the sociology of ufology. Therefore its cumulative issues constitute a precious historical archive."[44]
In his 1998 autobiography Penetration: The Question of Extraterrestrial and Human Telepathy, Swann described his work with individuals in an unknown agency who study extraterrestrials, his remote viewing of a secret E.T. base on the hidden side of the moon and his "shocking" experience with a sexy scantily dressed female E.T. in a Los Angeles supermarket. He concludes that extraterrestrials are living on earth in humanoid bodies. A friend warned him that there are many extraterrestrials, that many are "bio-androids", and that they are aware their only foes on earth are psychics. While Swann and an individual known as "Mr. Axelrod" were secretly watching a UFO appear and suck up the water of a lake, they were discovered and attacked by the UFO. Swann was injured but was dragged to safety by his colleagues.[45][46][47][48]

Publications[edit]

  • To Kiss Earth Good-bye: Adventures and Discoveries in the Nonmaterial, "Recounted by the Man who has Astounded Physicists and Parapsychologists Throughout the World".
  • Self-help books:
    • Everybody's Guide to Natural ESP: Unlocking the Extrasensory Power of Your Mind[49]
    • Your Nostradamus Factor - Accessing Your Innate Ability to See Into the Future[50]
    • Psychic sexuality: The bio-psychic "anatomy" of sexual energies[51]
  • 1979 Fiction. Star Fire. 0 7221 8303 8
  • 1980 book on future world events: What Will Happen to You When the Soviets Take Over?[52]
  • Autobiography: Penetration: The Question of Extraterrestrial and Human Telepathy (1998).[48][

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Know How... 57: Turn Your Android into a Spy Cam




Published on Aug 22, 2013
You demanded it! Today you'll know how to make your Android into a surveillance camera!

Find full show notes at http://twit.tv/show/know-how/57




IP Webcam







https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pas.webcam&hl=en

IP Webcam turns your phone into a network camera with multiple viewing options. View your camera on any platform with VLC player or web browser. Stream video inside WiFi network without internet access.
Optional Ivideon cloud broadcasting is supported for instant global access.

Two-way audio supported in tinyCam Monitor on another android device.
Use IP Webcam with third-party MJPG software, including video surveillance software, security monitors and most audio players.
Features include:
• Several web renderers to choose from: Flash, Javascript or built-in
• Video recording in WebM, MOV or MPEG4 (on Android 4.1+)
• Audio streaming in wav, opus and AAC (AAC requires Android 4.1+)
• Motion detection with sound trigger, Tasker integration.
• Date, time and battery level video overlay.
• Sensor data acquisition with online web graphing.
• Videochat support (video stream only for Windows and Linux via an universal MJPEG video streaming driver)
• Cloud push notifications on motion and sound, cloud recording for motion-triggered records, online video broadcasting powered by Ivideon.
• Advanced baby and pet monitor features: night vision, motion detection, sound detection and audio streaming.
Lite version is supported with unobtrusive ads. It's fully functional, but lacks Tasker integration, customizable user interface (only editor is present) and has a watermark over recorded videos.
Email me if you have questions after reading the FAQ.


tinyCam Monitor FREE


tinyCam Monitor is probably the best app for remote surveillance, control and digital video recording for your private or public network or IP cameras, video encoders and DVRs.
tinyCam Monitor FREE is the free, ad-supported version of tinyCam Monitor.

Features of tinyCam Monitor FREE edition:
H.264 codec (SW and HW) support for FOSCAM.
MPEG4/H264 for many cams via RTSP protocol.
ONVIF cameras support.
P2P support.
- Support for M-JPEG based devices of all major vendors, e.g. Axis, FOSCAM, D-Link, Edimax, Panasonic, Pixord, TRENDnet, Mobotix, Vivotek.
- 1-way audio (listening) demo mode (30 sec only).
- Support for up to 16 cams (4 simultaneously).
3 multiple camera layouts.
Sequence mode for automatic cameras switching.
Control PTZ (Pan/Tilt/Zoom) enabled devices.
- One click camera sharing by email.
- Import/export settings to SD or Dropbox service.
- Digital zoom.
- Snapshot to SD card.


Upgrade to tinyCam Monitor PRO to unlock:
- No ads.
- Additional 11 camera layouts.
- 24/7 MP4 video recording (Android 4.3+) to local storage/SD and JPEGs recording to the cloud (Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon Cloud Drive) and FTP/FTPS server.
- Internal web server for remote archive access.
- 2-way audio support (selective models).
- LAN scanner for automatic cams detection.
- SSL support (HTTPS protocol).
- Support for both in-app and on-camera motion detection (selective models).
- Face detection.
- Audio real-time processing (squelch & alarm) for using it as a baby monitor with audio graph.
- Audio monitoring from multiple cameras at once.
- Background audio.
- Sensors support (e.g. temperature sensor, humidity, etc.).
- Google Cast™ Ready (Chromecast) support.
- Android Wear support.
- Widgets, home shortcuts, floating window.
- Tasker/Locale plugin.
- Priority developer support.

Check the list of supported manufacturers:

http://tinycammonitor.com/support.html

IP Camera Training: How an IP camera system works




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79G4InvJX78

Uploaded on May 24, 2011
Click here for more videos ► http://goo.gl/m0vvLq

▶ IP Video Surveillance Smart Guide, see it here https://youtu.be/wYQzuVS_27c
"How An IP Camera System Works" Tutorial timeline:
00:00 Analog vs. Digital system comparison
00:57 Why IP cameras are more popular than Analog systems
01:33 Comparing IP camera vs. Analog system topology
01:55 Comparing Centralized vs. Decentralized IP camera systems

If you would like know more about "what a decentralized system is" please check out this tutorial http://youtu.be/QGpPbYooAoQ?list=UUyo...

Download our FREE IP Surveillance Starter Guide... http://www.mxinstaller.com/tag/ip-sur...

How an IP camera system works. In this IP camera tutorial we explain the difference between low and high resolution video surveillance systems. We also explain the differences between centralized vs. decentralized IP camera systems. This is a useful guide for both business and home owners who are currently in the market for a security camera system.

We look at the key differences between analogue and digital security camera systems. As a bonus, we also delve into the important differences between centralized and decentralized surveillance systems.

It's important to note that while 'decentralized' IP cameras can be more expensive to buy upfront than 'centralized' IP cameras, however the overall system and installation costs, including cabling, storage, software etc, is usually very competitive.

For buyers who are seeking a new security camera system for their home or business, we would recommend our IP Surveillance Starter Guide. which you can preview here https://youtu.be/wYQzuVS_27c

Other online MOBOTIX training resources available...
★ IP Smart Surveillance Smart Guide https://youtu.be/wYQzuVS_27c
★ The HDTV IP Camera Myth http://youtu.be/f7IWttAxjT8
★ ONVIF Explained http://youtu.be/wMpXgM_M7Ss
★ IP Camera Buyer's Guide http://youtu.be/eUx9TNlWWjo
★ How an IP Camera System Works http://youtu.be/79G4InvJX78
★ Check out our BLOG http://www.mxinstaller.com
★ Our IP Video Community http://www.mxinstaller.com/forums/
★ Our IP Video Magazine http://www.mxinstaller.com/emag

▶ Join our non-spammy mailing list http://www.mxinstaller.com/sub-update/

More MxInstaller tutorials can be found here...
http://www.mxinstaller.com

Let's connect !
http://twitter.com/mxinstaller
http://mxinstaller.com

Thursday, October 22, 2015

What is you GMT/ Current Time Zone

When ever you need this info for the security cameras ,computer game station or any device to setup the time zone; this is the site where you can get your answer

The reference point is always GMT. Clocks change, but Greenwich Mean Time, displayed here, never goes back or forward. - See more at: http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/#sthash.GYmD5Jl3.dpuf



Maybe you want to know more about the history behind Greenwich Mean Time: What is GMT? 

example:

What time is it in Florida Time Zone / Current time

What time zone is Florida Time in?

The Eastern part of Florida (which includes all the major towns and cities) fall in the Eastern Time Zone , which is 5 hours behind Greenwich Mean Time ( GMT-5 ).
The Western part of the Florida panhandle falls in the Central Time Zone , which is 6 hours behind Greenwich Mean Time ( GMT-6 ).

Current Florida Time (Eastern Time)

Current time now in Time Zone: America New York (USA Eastern Time)

Towns and Cities in Florida on Eastern Time

Anna Maria, FL | Altamonte Springs, FL | Apopka, FL | Atlantic Beach, FL | Auburndale, FL | Aventura, FL | Bal Harbour, FL | Bartow, FL | Belleair Bluffs, FL | Boca Raton, FL | Boynton Beach, FL | Bradenton, FL | Brooksville, FL Cape Canaveral, FL Cape Coral, FL | Casselberry, FL | Clearwater, FL | Cocoa, FL | Cocoa Beach, FL | Coconut Creek, FL | Coral Gables, FL | Coral Springs, FL | Crystal River, FL | Davie, FL | Daytona Beach, FL | Deerfield Beach, FL | DeLand, FL | Delray Beach, FL | Deltona, FL | Dunedin, FL | Edgewater, FL | Eagle Lake, FL | Eustis, FL | Everglades City, FL | Fort Lauderdale, FL | Fort Meade, FL | Fort Myers, FL | Fort Myers Beach, FL | Fort Pierce, FL | Frostproof, FL | Fruitland Park, FL | Gainesville, FL: | Greenacres, FL | Green Cove Springs, FL | Gretna, FL | Gulfport, FL | Haines City, FL | Hawthorne, FL | Hialeah, FL | Hillsboro Beach, FL | Hollywood, FL | Holmes Beach, FL | Homestead, FL | Hypoluxo, FL | Indialantic, FL | Islamorada, FL | Jacksonville, FL | Juno Beach, FL | Jupiter, FL | Key Biscayne, FL | Key West, FL | Kissimmee, FL | La Belle, FL | Lake Alfred, FL | Lake Mary, FL | Lake Park, FL | Lake Wales, FL | Lake Worth, FL | Lantana, FL | Largo, FL | Lauderhill, FL | Leesburg, FL | Lighthouse Point, FL | Longboat Key, FL | Longwood, FL | Maitland, FL | Marco Island, FL | Margate, FL | Melbourne, FL | Miami, FL | Miami Beach, FL | Miramar, FL | Mount Dora, FL | Naples, FL New Port Richey, FL | North Bay Village, FL | North Lauderdale, FL | North Miami Beach, FL | North Port, FL | Oakland Park, FL | Ocala, FL | Ocean Ridge, FL | Ocoee, FL | Okeechobe, FL | Oldsmar, FL | Orlando, FL | Ormond Beach, FL | Oviedo, FL | Palatka, FL | Palm Bay, FL | Palm Beach, FL | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | Palm Beach Town, FL | Palm Coast, FL | Palm Springs, FL | Pembroke Pines, FL | Plantation, FL | Pinecrest, FL | Pinellas Park, FL | Plant City, FL | Pompano Beach, FL | Ponce Inlet, FL | Port Orange, FL | Port St. Lucie, FL | Punta Gorda, FL | Quincy, FL | Rockledge, FL | Royal Palm Beach, FL | Safety Harbor, FL | Sanford, FL | Sanibel, FL | Sarasota, FL | Satellite Beach, FL | Sebastian, FL | Sewall's Point, FL | South Pasadena, FL | St. Augustine, FL | St. Augustine Beach, FL | St. Cloud, FL | St. Pete Beach, FL | St. Petersburg, FL | Stuart, FL | Surfside, FL | Tallahassee, FL | Tamarac, FL | Tampa, FL | Tarpon Springs, FL | Tavares, FL | Temple Terrace, FL | Titusville, FL | Treasure Island, FL | Venice, FL | Vero Beach, FL | Wellington, FL | West Melbourne, FL | West Palm Beach, FL | White Springs, FL | Wilton Manors, FL | Winter Garden, FL | Winter Haven, FL | Winter Park, FL | Winter Springs, FL

Towns and Cities in Florida on Central Time

Chipley, FL | DeFuniak Springs, FL | Destin, FL | Fort Walton Beach, FL | Gulf Breeze, FL | Lynn Haven, FL | Mary Esther, FL | Mexico Beach, FL | Milton, FL | Niceville, FL | Panama City, FL | Panama City Beach, FL | Pensacola, FL | Shalimar, FL | Valparaiso, FL

Current Florida Panhandle Time (Central Time)

Time Zone: America Chicago (USA Central Time)

Does Florida Time observe Daylight Saving Time?

Like most states in the US, Daylight Saving Time ( DST ) is observed in Florida, where the time is shifted forward by 1 hour, resulting in a 4 hours and 5 hours difference behind GMT for the Eastern and Western part of Florida respectively.
After the Summer months the time is shifted back by 1 hour resulting in the normal time difference behind GMT

USA & Canada clocks

Daylight Saving Time dates 2015

Sunday 8 March 2015 2am local time 
until Sunday 1 November 2015 2am local time 
see: Daylight-Saving-Time.com for details
USA and Canada Standard Time Date schedules here
- See more at: http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/florida/time/#sthash.16rDVj4n.dpuf